• Kandivali West Mumbai 400067, India
  • 022 39167251
  • support@email.com
December 19, 2022

SOP on filing of Appeals/ Special leave petition by Income Tax Department in Supreme Court

SOP on filing of Appeals/ Special leave petition by Income Tax Department in Supreme Court

Several instructions and directions have been issued by the CBDT from time to time emphasizing upon the need for timely filing of appeals/SLPs in the Supreme Court and proper conduct of litigation. However, a number of SLPs are being filed with inordinate delay. In the wake of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s directions to adopt ICT (Information and Communication Technology) initiatives to streamline, monitor and provide seamless integration of all stages in government revenue litigation across the board, a umBs Committee and a High-Powered Committee were constituted. The High-Powered Committee has suggested to the board for changes in SLP proposal initiation, timely sending of SLP proposal to DoLA and use of single file instead of initiating fresh files through e-office by different authorities to cut down the delay. The High Powered Committee has advised the Board to work towards a “Zero Delay Regime” in the matter of filing of appeals/SLPs.

  • In view of the above and with a view to ensure filing of appeals/SLPs within the period
    prescribed, following instructions are issued in supersession of all earlier instructions on the subject.

Time Lines for processing of proposals for filing SLPs

  • With a view to ensure timely filing of appeals/SLPs in the Supreme Court, the timelines
    for processing proposals at different levels are modified and enclosed as per Annexure-A, for strict adherence by all concerned

3.1 Responsibility to ensure timely processing of proposals – The Pr.CCIT/CCIT and

Pr.CIT/CIT concerned shall ensure timely processing of Proposals and their submission to the Directorate of L&R as per the timelines given in Annexure A. Any deviation from the timelines will have to be duly explained and delay without proper explanation or due to negligence will be viewed adversely.

4. Institutional mechanism for processing proposals for appeals/ StiPs to the Supreme Court:

  1. The Pr. CCITICCIT having jurisdiction over the station having Bench of the High Court, shall ensure a proper institutional mechanism for timely dissemination of downloaded copy/certified copy of High Court’s order/judgment, whichever is available first, to Pr.CsIT/CsIT having jurisdiction over respective cases.
  2. The Pr. CCIT/CCIT, shall set-up a High Court Cell at each station within their jurisdiction where a Bench of the High Court is situated, Such cell shall be headed by a DCIT/ACITITO (as decided by the Pr. CCITICCIT, depending upon availability of manpower and the work load) with adequate number of Inspectors and other support staff and appropriate infrastructural facilities to make it properly functional. Appropriate monitoring and supervision mechanism of the High Court Cell shall be prescribed by the Pr. CCITICCIT under intimation to the Pr. DGIT (L&R).
  3. The High Court Cell shall obtain particulars of cases finally heard from Standing Counsels at the end of each working day and intimate particulars of the cases, such as the name of the case, Assessment Year, Name of the Standing Counsel etc. with a summary of the proceedings to the Pr. CIT/CIT concerned without any delay. For outstation Pr. CsIT/ CsIT, such information shall be sent through e-mail/Fax.
  4. The Cell shall also track orders/judgments pronounced on daily basis. Such information should be compiled from the daily cause list, Senior Standing Counsels and from Court room/registry of the High Court. The information so compiled should be transmitted to Pr. CIT/CIT concerned immediately on a regular basis through personal delivery/e-mail/fax.
  5. The Administrative Pr. CsIT/CsIT shall also set up proper institutional mechanism in their respective charges to access the website of the High Court to download orders/Judgments relating to their charge as soon as these are uploaded. The orders can be downloaded from websites such as http://www.indiancourts.nic.in or http://www.courtnic.nic.in where link of all High Courts is provided. An officer of the charge should be nominated for this purpose. Such officer shall access the website everyday and keep a log of the same. The nominated officer shall also maintain regular co-ordination with the High Court Cell(s) dealing with the cases of the charge.

Processing of proposals for appeal/SLP on receipt of the order of High Court

  5. The following important issues need to be noted in processing proposals for SLPs for due compliance:

For filing SLP, period of limitation begins from the date of judgment/order of the High Court

  1. In case an application for grant of certificate of fitness u/s 261 of the Income-tax Act, 196 l is made, the limitation to file Civil AppeaUSLP is 60 days from disposal of the application.
  2. The proposal for SLP against the High Court’s order shall be initiated on the basis of an ordinary copy/ the copy of the order downloaded from the website (as referred to above) of the Court without waiting for the certified copy of the order. The certified copy of the order shall be sent separately as soon as it is received to determine the exact date of limitation. The timeline for processing the SLP proposal at the level of Pr.CIT concerned, shall not in any case, exceed 20 days from the date of judgment.
  3. In order to avoid delay, the Pr.CCITiPr.CsIT should consider the SLP proposals as per their judicial appreciation of the impugned order/judgment of the High Court and need not seek legal opinion in every case from the Standing Counsels as the Ministry of Law & Justice and Ld. Law officers of the Government of India are consulted in appropriate cases before filing the SLPs.
  4. The process of filing SLP proposal should invariably be initiated only at the level of jurisdictional Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner in the field. Pr.CIT/CIT is the custodian of all the records while litigation in High Court is on and is responsible for initiating the process for filing of SLP.
  5. After due consideration, the proposal for SLP must be sent by the Pr. CsIT!CsIT to the Directorate of Income-tax (L&R) within the time-limits prescribed in Annexure-A. In case of delay, detailed justification should be furnished along with the corrective action taken to prevent recurrence of delay in future.
  6. The revised Proforma B, enclosed as Annexure B to this instruction, duly filled-in along with one set of required documents annexed to it, should be sent with the proposal, The proposal along with soft copy of all annexures is to be sent to the Directorate of L&R necessarily through email I e-office.

SLP filed by the assesse

6.   If the Hon’ble Supreme Court directs issue of notice on the SLP filed by the assessee,Registry of the Supreme Court serves the notice along with the Special Leave Petition to the respondent Pr.CIT/CIT or other respondent officer directly. The PECIT/CIT or such other respondent officer, through his Pr.CIT/CIT, should submit the following documents to the Directorate of Income-tax (L&R) for entering appearance before the Hon’ble Court and for filing counter affidavit:

  1. A copy of the notice along with the paper book served by the Registry.
  2. Para wise comments on the Special Leave Petition placed in the paper book.
  3. A Vakalatnama duly executed in favour of Assistant Government Advocate, Central Agency Section, Ministry of Law.

The aforesaid documents should be submitted strictly within three weeks from the receipt of the notice to the Directorates of Legal and Research.

Processing of SLP proposals in the Directorate of IA R

  • The Pr. DGIT (L&R) shall ensure the following:

i. After due consideration of the proposal within the Directorate of L&R, the proposal is sent to the Ministry of Law within 20 days of the receipt, if approved by the Board and;

ii. Time-lines mentioned in the Annexure-A to this Instruction for timely filing of SLPs are adhered to strictly.

Compliance of directions of lion’ble Supreme Court

8 Directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court must be complied with, within the time allowed. The Pr.CIT/CIT shall personally ensure compliance of directions relating to Dasti service, filing of counter or rejoinder affidavit or other specific directions, to avoid adverse observations.

Quality of SLP Proposals

9.1  The quality of proposal sent by the PLCIT/CIT is extremely important for efficient an effective litigation management in the Department. The Pr.CIT/CIT must ensure that the complete proforma B along with all requisite documents is submitted along with the SLP proposal. Any deficiency in this regard causes avoidable delays in processing of the proposals.

9.2  It must also be noted that appeal to the High Court and the Supreme Court can be filed only on ‘Substantial Questions of Law’. It has, however, been observed that many SLP proposals involve only ‘questions of fact’. The CCsIT shall ensure that the proposals for SLPs are well examined and forwarded to the Directorate of L&R only in those cases where ‘substantial questions of law’ are involved.

9.3  All High Court orders which are against the revenue but found acceptable by the Pr. Commissioner/Commissioner will be put up to the jurisdictional Chief Commissioner within 15 days of pronouncement of the judgment for his concurrence. In case, the CCIT directs submission of SLP proposal in a case, the same shall be done within time frame prescribed in Annexure A.

Assistance to Law officers/Appearing Counsels

10. The Pr. CIT/CIT concerned should ensure that the Law Officer/Appearing Counsel

representing the case is briefed properly before the hearing. Whenever, Law officer/Appealing Counsel seek instructions/clarifications in a case, the same must be provided by the PLCIT/CIT on priority.

Monitoring Compliance of this Instruction

11.1 The Pr. DGIT (L&R) shall monitor the compliance of time lines for submission of SLP proposals and send a quarterly report to the Member (A&J), CBDT giving list of cases where the proposal for filing SLP was received beyond the prescribed time lines. Due dates of the quarterly reports are – 15th July, 15th October, 15th January and 15th April. The report shall indicate the Pr.CCIT/CC1T region, the Pr.CIT/CIT charge and number of days of delay along with the action taken and/or proposed to be taken.

11.2 In the quarterly report, the Pr. DOLT (L&R) shall also report cases of delays beyond the prescribed time lines for:

  1. Sending the SLP to Ministry of Law;
  2. Vetting of draft SLP; and
  3. Filing of SLP by the CAS after vetting.

Reasons of delay in such matters and the steps taken/proposed to be taken shall also be mentioned in the report. Delays, if any, on the part of counsels and CAS etc. shall be brought out clearly to be taken up with the Law Ministry appropriately.

12.  This Instruction shall apply in respect of the orders/judgments of High Courts pronounced on or after the date of issue of this Instruction. Necessary concurrence of Ministry of Law & Justice has been obtained.

Enter your email address:

Subscribe to faceless complainces

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

Leave a Reply

Follow by Email